‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

When did Google get so weird?

2011 points · 1123 comments · sancho-panza

  1. Hugsbox · · focus · HN ↗
    Yesterday I tried to google "can the Halifax Wanderers still make the CPL playoffs?"

    So obviously what appears right at the top is the AI summary, which told me "they've already secured their #4 position and made the playoffs". I knew this wasn't true, and I guess I could have just scrolled down a bit further and found my answer but now I was curious.

    So I said "that's not true, they're still #5, what I want to know is _could they still make the playoffs_"

    It says they've got an upcoming game against Ottawa, and if they win their chances are good. That game has already taken place, so I correct it again and finally I get a reasonable answer.

    My question is: what's the point of the AI in the search engine if it itself isn't going to use the search engine first before answering? Like, I can't wrap my head around that. The answer is on the same page as its hallucination. It could have done a cursory look around before first hallucinating something completely false, and when corrected the first time giving me outdated information. It's meant to be A SEARCH ENGINE!

    1. safety1st · · focus · HN ↗
      Google.com is REALLY bad right now in my opinion.

      The AI answer dominates the page, and is usually wrong, so it's just a waste of the most valuable space on the page.

      The ads have proliferated, and rarely have what I need.

      Video search results also take up a lot of the page, and are almost never what I want if I haven't clicked over to the Video tab. Again, just a big waste of space.

      Speaking of the Video tab its accuracy/relevancy has gotten worse too.

      The organic results have deteriorated, and are still competitive, but are no longer clearly and consistently better than Duckduckgo.

      So it's duckduckgo as the default for me on all devices now. If I don't find what I want, which is maybe 30% of the time, I switch over to G just by adding !g to the query. G might have what I need in about half of those cases.

      You can see why a lot of people just ask an LLM to do the web searching for them.

      Across the board, this is all quite bad compared to web search from 10+ years ago.

      If there's a single thing which has really pushed me away from Google, it's simply google.com devoting so much of the page to things that aren't organic web search.

      1. microtonal · · focus · HN ↗
        The AI answer dominates the page, and is usually wrong, so it's just a waste of the most valuable space on the page.

        I started noticing that for a lot of niche questions, AI overview often uses things like Reddit comments as the source, which are often partially or completely wrong. Then it gets reformulated with the typical confidence of an LLM.

        Very scary because at the same time I notice people taking the AI overview answers as truth.

        1. gloosx · · focus · HN ↗
          The actual scary part is that people already manipulate and poison the google overviews on purpose.

          It is very easy to bring your bs to the TOP spot on google at the moment with carefully crafted reddit comments and blogs, and it's not hard to get to the traffic and clicks this way.

          This is what the new SEO is about, I know a bunch of people who are doing this and they are praying it is not getting fixed anytime soon.

          1. latentsea · · focus · HN ↗
            The real alignment problem. Getting humans to behave.
            1. phoronixrly · · focus · HN ↗
              Yeah, good luck getting me to be a good little source of information for LLM companies to profit from.
              1. tripzilch · · focus · HN ↗
                Thanks for your pushback, sir. You're completely right.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.