‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Ember-1

589 points · 249 comments · gmays

  1. soerxpso · · focus · HN ↗
    I don't see why I would be interested in this model, considering the price difference. They advertise that it's the same as Kimi K3 in half the tokens. But the pricing is double the pricing of K3. So why do I care if it uses fewer tokens, if I'm paying double per token?
    1. verdverm · · focus · HN ↗
      the pricing is the same, where are you seeing double?
      1. tyingq · · focus · HN ↗
        K3 is cheaper from other providers. $1/$9, though I can't speak to how good those providers are.

        <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;openrouter.ai&#x2F;moonshotai&#x2F;kimi-k3" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;openrouter.ai&#x2F;moonshotai&#x2F;kimi-k3

        1. verdverm · · focus · HN ↗
          as the saying goes, you get what you pay for

          we require ZDR and Fireworks provides that on contract, so for us they are the same price

          1. indigodaddy · · focus · HN ↗
            Check out Neuralwatt. They are ZDR and great energy based K3 pricing. They also have a K3-fast which is basically no reasoning (in addition to regular K3).
            1. verdverm · · focus · HN ↗
              that is nothing like how we consume Ai

              industry standard is price-per-1M tokens, don&#x27;t do something different, even Google caved and moved from their char based pricing to tokens (the fundamental unit of computation in ai)

              GPUs are rented in $&#x2F;h, like every other piece of hardware in cloud

              1. indigodaddy · · focus · HN ↗
                Energy based is way more fundamental than token based. To each their own.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.