‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Ember-1

589 points · 249 comments · gmays

  1. GodelNumbering · · focus · HN ↗
    This is the golden age of model training. Some days ago, I decided I wanted a local CPU only model that can perform exceptionally well for English to Bash translation (to avoid the googling for command syntax). I got a bunch of subagents to generate large amount of training data (140k+ samples), got the Qwen 3 0.6B base model, pointed Astra at it, and off to the races. It trained for 2 days (on and off) and I got a surprisingly good model for my task! The total active time I spent was a few hours. And it is still improving, what a time to be alive!
    1. amelius · · focus · HN ↗
      I don't understand. If you have a model that can do bash examples already (your subagents), then why would you need to train a model?

      Or are the subagents generating your training data using a closed/paid model?

      1. lp92 · · focus · HN ↗
        You can run a small model locally with very low latency on consumer hardware not to mention the privacy benefits.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.