‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Ember-1

589 points · 249 comments · gmays

  1. GodelNumbering · · focus · HN ↗
    This is the golden age of model training. Some days ago, I decided I wanted a local CPU only model that can perform exceptionally well for English to Bash translation (to avoid the googling for command syntax). I got a bunch of subagents to generate large amount of training data (140k+ samples), got the Qwen 3 0.6B base model, pointed Astra at it, and off to the races. It trained for 2 days (on and off) and I got a surprisingly good model for my task! The total active time I spent was a few hours. And it is still improving, what a time to be alive!
    1. brainless · · focus · HN ↗
      I have been trying a mix of fine-tuning and I am amazed that most people do not see this coming.

      A tiny, smaller than 1b parameter model, fine-tuned, can kick ass for constrained work. I do not have a lot of budget, I fine-tune only on a 16GB M4 Mac Mini. But that also tells me the potential is wild. Progress has been slow since I moonlight on this.

      I have been trying to build a set of models + agents for full-stack development, where each model does only a small piece, like take user prompt and break into backend/frontend tasks. Then a Rust+Diesel model, a Rust+Auxum model, a Solid+Router model and so on. I know this is wild but this is just theory - can 5 or 6 Qwen 3.5 0.8b models do full-stack web development? My hunch says they can, better than what most people expect. Heck, with a good harness, it might beat all the cheaper models for the specific task, like Haiku or Luna.

      1. RugnirViking · · focus · HN ↗
        remember to test against benchmarks. I would love to hear about your progress.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.