Thread

1. mikert89 · 1790528721 · focus · HN ↗

   It seems like anthropic is far ahead of openai, and has no reports like this. We have to conclude this is a skill issue/engineering quality problem inside openai.

   just because they are a well known name, doesnt mean they havent botched hiring over the last two years or so

   1. Razengan · 1790529196 · focus · HN ↗

      Anthropic's models seem crippled and hamstrung to begin with

      1. mikert89 · 1790529307 · focus · HN ↗

         have you tried opus 5.5? anthropic is way ahead, atleast in terms of publicly available models

         1. monideas · 1790529392 · focus · HN ↗

            Have you tried Astra? Way ahead?

            1. physicallyIllfr · 1790529983 · focus · HN ↗

               Slot machine users argue about which machine pays better

               Hint. You lose using either.

               1. mikert89 · 1790530701 · focus · HN ↗

                  [dead]

                  1. physicallyIllfr · 1790533147 · focus · HN ↗

                     Damn, the singularity is chat bots that can write spaghetti code that compiles?

                     Very underwhelming.

                     1. preg_match · 1790563973 · focus · HN ↗

                        I don't know that we're in the singularity, but we are certainly past the point where LLMs can only write spaghetti code. LLMs can write complex systems, when properly lead by software engineers. They can produce code faster, and at a higher quality, than purely human endeavors.

                        The higher quality part is the part people are missing. You can write much more robust code using LLMs because you can employ more comprehensive testing strategies. People are using LLMs to find hundreds of vulnerabilities in popular software. Imagine how much more secure software can be when LLMs because integrated into the process of writing, testing, and penetration testing code.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.