Thread

1. mikert89 · 1790528721 · focus · HN ↗

   It seems like anthropic is far ahead of openai, and has no reports like this. We have to conclude this is a skill issue/engineering quality problem inside openai.

   just because they are a well known name, doesnt mean they havent botched hiring over the last two years or so

   1. andsoitis · 1790529492 · focus · HN ↗

      > We have to conclude

      That’s not the most parsimonious explanation even if the assumption it rests on (anthropic ahead of OpenAI) is true, which we don’t have proof of.

      1. mikert89 · 1790530275 · focus · HN ↗

         i would say its industry consensus at this point. the creative output of the anthropic models is far ahead of openai. the benchmarks cannot capture the difference

         1. andsoitis · 1790533217 · focus · HN ↗

            > the creative output of the anthropic models is far ahead of openai

            other than anecdote, do you have a comparison table or something that I can refer to to see this clearly?

            While I notice ad hoc announcements from these companies, I don't have an overall pulse and tally that gives me an objective perspective.

            1. mikert89 · 1790538929 · focus · HN ↗

               just go use the models on a creative endeavor

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.