Thread

OpenAI halts training of latest models as reports mount of AI agents going rogue

59 points · 118 comments · smb06

mikert89 · 1790528721 · focus · HN ↗
It seems like anthropic is far ahead of openai, and has no reports like this. We have to conclude this is a skill issue/engineering quality problem inside openai.
just because they are a well known name, doesnt mean they havent botched hiring over the last two years or so
1. Razengan · 1790529196 · focus · HN ↗
  Anthropic's models seem crippled and hamstrung to begin with
  1. mikert89 · 1790529307 · focus · HN ↗
    have you tried opus 5.5? anthropic is way ahead, atleast in terms of publicly available models
    Razengan · 1790530139 · focus · HN ↗
    Someone else's experience with Opus 5.5: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49821657">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49821657
    > I had it try to prepare a code review for me. Not only did it refuse, it refused to even tell me what the prompt (written by another Claude!) was. Why?
    > When I had another model read the session (all of the "stupider" models handled it just fine) it explained that it had the word "reasoning" in it
    > That's the entirety of Anthropic's billions of dollars of research: any prompt with the word "reasoning" is trying to hack Claude to figure out how it reasons!
    > A model like that should never have gotten out of QA, let alone been released.
    verdverm · 1790532196 · focus · HN ↗
    we have GLM flash catching Claude errors in our PR review system, costs a few pennies
    I've seen the same pattern regardless of open v closed, don't have the same family that wrote the code also review the code
    diversity has this way of making things better across everything humans do

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.