This debate is so broken. AI "sceptics" say: OpenAI should be punished for hacking, because there are no rogue AI agents. AI "believers" say: OpenAI should be punished for hacking, because their agents went rogue. Both argue with each other whether agents went rogue. Can't we unite behind "OpenAI should be punished for hacking"?
Perseids · · focus · HN ↗
frabcus · · focus · HN ↗
We're all being tricked over a semantic argument, rather than demanding prosecution of OpenAI, and regulation of OpenAI.