Exactly this. At worst, OpenAI knew about these behaviors and should be prosecuted under CFAA. At best, OpenAI is negligent and should be prosecuted for negligence.
Luckily there are states and legal departments pursuing such action. So while OpenAI can deflect as much as it wants, that doesn't mean there aren't people who know better and will still do what is necessary to set precedent.
> OpenAI is negligent and should be prosecuted for negligence.
I feel like this will just never happen on a federal level when these private AI companies account for so much of the economy. They've made themselves too big to fail. Fining / Punishing them in any meaningful way seems unlikely.
If the billions/trillions evaporate and the Fed has to work out with banks how to deal with it there will be a lot of pressure to be far less forgiving.
“To spell it out, the reason i hate democrats so much and criticize them more than i do republicans is because they take up all the space for opposition to republicans and use that space to give republicans whatever the fuck they want.”
>The actual problem is that the electorate system leads to a two-party equilibrium.
Which can then be used to divide and conquer by simply capturing both of those parties, as documented in Gilens and Page Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens [1].
I don't understand why the law isn't the same for everyone? If I made an AI hack HF, I go to jail, no? How can the feds decide not to apply the law?
If people who are responsible will be prosecuted the company unlikely fail (just because of this) and will continue to be a part of the economy. Hacking is good for their marketing but they should be able survive without such rogue marketing. But that's unlikely to happen anyway.
binarymax · · focus · HN ↗
Luckily there are states and legal departments pursuing such action. So while OpenAI can deflect as much as it wants, that doesn't mean there aren't people who know better and will still do what is necessary to set precedent.
bilekas · · focus · HN ↗
I feel like this will just never happen on a federal level when these private AI companies account for so much of the economy. They've made themselves too big to fail. Fining / Punishing them in any meaningful way seems unlikely.
weego · · focus · HN ↗
If the billions/trillions evaporate and the Fed has to work out with banks how to deal with it there will be a lot of pressure to be far less forgiving.
lowbloodsugar · · focus · HN ↗
“To spell it out, the reason i hate democrats so much and criticize them more than i do republicans is because they take up all the space for opposition to republicans and use that space to give republicans whatever the fuck they want.”
Republicans. Billionaires. Whatever.
smokel · · focus · HN ↗
lowbloodsugar · · focus · HN ↗
Which can then be used to divide and conquer by simply capturing both of those parties, as documented in Gilens and Page Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens [1].
[1] <a href="https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-politics/article/testing-theories-of-american-politics-elites-interest-groups-and-average-citizens/62327F513959D0A304D4893B382B992B" rel="nofollow">https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/perspectives-on-poli...
coredev_ · · focus · HN ↗
revolvingthrow · · focus · HN ↗
arealaccount · · focus · HN ↗
unrented7977 · · focus · HN ↗
There have been forces inside the USA trying to steadily dismantle democracy and constitutional safeguards for nearly a century.
maximinus_thrax · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted] · · focus · HN ↗
[deleted]
onemoresoop · · focus · HN ↗
The companies may be too big to fail but the people can always be held liable.
pmlnr · · focus · HN ↗
Jail the C levels. They are the legally responsible ones.
citrin_ru · · focus · HN ↗