‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

The Normalization of Inexplicable Failures

277 points · 124 comments · pxx

  1. pmarreck · · focus · HN ↗
    I am big on reproducibility (nix aficionado) and determinism (flagging test failures are a red-alert, all-hands-on-deck situation in my world) and correctness.

    I am also big on testing (the correct things). And nine-nines (big on Elixir).

    And... I'm also big on agent-assisted dev. Which requires pretty much every check in the book to stay productive in. And that's fine to me. I've seen bugs that I wouldn't have made myself. And I've also seen my own bugs fixed. They've all gotten fixed in short order. I don't see why this is a problem.

    Raise your personal standards.

    Thing is, the unreliable-software situation was already untenable before agents (in poor hands) made it worse.

    1. sscaryterry · · focus · HN ↗
      This, 100% I've seen far far worse produced by humans.
      1. Tanjreeve · · focus · HN ↗
        If the anti-AI people have skill issues because they're holding it wrong then when the output is crap it's the fault of the person with no skill issues who is using It correctly. It can't be both ways.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.