> I wasn’t sure how to find out what an “LI????77” was […]. I would be interested to learn non-LLM ways to figure this out though. There must be a way.
Back in my days I simply googled my way through the nomenclature of batteries. I feel pretty old, somehow.
In recent months (I don't use it enough to confidently state when the change occurred) Google's LLM summary more often answers the wrong question rather than confidently answering the question wrong.
If it answers and the answer is for what I asked, it is right much more often than not. With that said, "trust but verify" is more like "don't trust and also verify" anyway, which is the same metric that should be used for most websites.
MrGilbert · · focus · HN ↗
Back in my days I simply googled my way through the nomenclature of batteries. I feel pretty old, somehow.
sublinear · · focus · HN ↗
I don't think much has changed at all. The LLMs don't magically have new information that didn't already exist out there.
zdragnar · · focus · HN ↗
If it answers and the answer is for what I asked, it is right much more often than not. With that said, "trust but verify" is more like "don't trust and also verify" anyway, which is the same metric that should be used for most websites.
artisinal · · focus · HN ↗