‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI

631 points · 623 comments · papergirl

  1. papergirl · · focus · HN ↗
    Newly released court filings quote an OpenAI researcher saying: “I was just worried about optics - i.e. 'openai uses copyrighted data from sketchy russian website’ showing up on HN would be unfortunate."

    That's just one of several interesting quotes that have surfaced in documents from the Authors Guild's lawsuit against OpenAI.

    1. swiftcoder · · focus · HN ↗
      It's good to know we all live rent-free in Dario Amodei's head
      1. MisterMunchkin · · focus · HN ↗

        [dead]

        1. throwaway27448 · · focus · HN ↗
          Surely anthropic has a customer service channel you can use
          1. dgellow · · focus · HN ↗
            You’re jocking right?
            1. throwaway27448 · · focus · HN ↗
              I just want to keep this crap off public spaces; anyone who gives money to anthropic can deal with that relationship separately
              1. dgellow · · focus · HN ↗
                Sure but Anthropic customer support is infamous enough for being close to non existent
                1. throwaway27448 · · focus · HN ↗
                  Caveat emptor; please don't drag that here.
                  1. ssl-3 · · focus · HN ↗
                    [delayed]
                2. NateEag · · focus · HN ↗
                  Maybe, if you don't like how the company treats its customers and craps all over the commons, you could not use their products.
                  1. dgellow · · focus · HN ↗
                    I’m not the person you should say that to, I already don’t use them. My previous comment was specifically about “report that to their customer support”. Anthropic doesn’t have actual customer support
                    1. NateEag · · focus · HN ↗
                      My apologies - I did not read the thread carefully enough.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.