‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Unsealed Briefs in Authors’ Case v. Microsoft/OpenAI

631 points · 623 comments · papergirl

  1. fwlr · · focus · HN ↗
    Cute that they were concerned, but they need not have worried - as you can clearly see from any HN comments section on these kinds of articles, everyone long ago wrote down their conclusion (“OpenAI/Anthropic/LLMs are good/bad”) at the bottom of the page, and now all we are doing is shuffling facts, quotes, and arguments around the page above it.

    We are very clever to make it look like the conclusion below follows from the arguments above; but we are also careful to never smudge our bottom line, so it will never change.

    1. dgellow · · focus · HN ↗
      Speak for yourself, mine did evolve a lot over the past year.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.