‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

DeepSeek Elastic Compute (DSec)

323 points · 116 comments · shenli3514

  1. flowerlad · · focus · HN ↗
    It seems every DeepSeek paper/patent has a huge number of authors, and this one is no exception. They couldn't even fit everyone on the page, there are 31 others not shown. This could be an asset protection strategy (i.e., human assets). Imagine if there were only 3 authors. Those authors may get hired away by competitors. If you list every employee on every paper then competitors don't know who to lure away.
    1. phytax · · focus · HN ↗
      Why is this the top comment? Many of the comments, as well as this one, have no relation to content and only mention a triviality
      1. antonvs · · focus · HN ↗
        It’s top comment because it’s anti-Chinese.
        1. locknitpicker · · focus · HN ↗
          > It’s top comment because it’s anti-Chinese.

          You need to tighten up your tinfoil hat. When HN features all the discussions on OpenAI's shenanigans on Navier-Stokes, you weren't seeing claims this was anti-US.

          1. alightsoul · · focus · HN ↗
            It wasn't anti us, it was anti ai company. Maybe because American exceptionalism states that the us can do no harm
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.