‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Automattic has a new board after failed attempt to put CEO on leave

148 points · 194 comments · ilamont

  1. flerchin · · focus · HN ↗
    It says he has 84% of the voting shares. Is there any possible way that the board could have been successful? Regardless of Mullenberg, (and I know he's controversial) a coup that is pre-ordained to fail seems like value destroying negligence.
    1. jordanb · · focus · HN ↗
      They could have known they wouldn't succeed but they could have decided their fiduciary duty requires them to either try or resign.
      1. hoten · · focus · HN ↗
        Didn't they craft themselves a nice golden parachute if fired? Then proceeded to kick off events that would guarantee their dismissal?

        That's less fiduciary duty and more hacking a payday.

        1. collingreen · · focus · HN ↗
          Getting out of a toxic job while failing up. Business can be strange sometimes.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.