‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Automattic has a new board after failed attempt to put CEO on leave

148 points · 194 comments · ilamont

  1. bloudermilk · · focus · HN ↗
    How does a CEO pull off resisting an ouster and firing the board?
    1. doikor · · focus · HN ↗
      By personally owning 84% of the voting shares. This coup was doomed to fail from the start.
      1. dylan604 · · focus · HN ↗
        Being on the board is a Sisyphean effort based on the weighted voting setup. Some seem to be slower to realize this. At that point, they could quit and walk away with nothing, or as others have suggested, this could have been done deliberately to at least get a payday on the way out.
    2. jordanb · · focus · HN ↗
      Apparently corporate structure gave him power over the board. Historically this kind of structure was considered undesirable and illegal in a public company, but beginning in the 2000s there was this idea that "visionary founders" should be able to demand absolute control, ex: Zuckerberg
      1. ValentineC · · focus · HN ↗
        Automattic also isn't a public company.

        I think many employees have hoped that it would IPO, but Mullenweg was already "post-economic" financially comfortable, and probably wasn't thrilled at giving up more control, or actually being subject to further scrutiny

    3. VCFundedGenYer · · focus · HN ↗
      The same way Mark Zuckerburg does - he maintains majority control.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.