Naturally, The Economist chooses the political stance of "blame lefty teachers and hooray for Baron Gove".The regional coverage remains excellent, but this kind of editorializing is the precise reason I stopped subscribing.
>but this kind of editorializing is the precise reason I stopped subscribing.It's filed under "leaders". It's by definition supposed to be "editorializing", because it's an editorial.<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editorial" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editorial
t0mpr1c3 · · focus · HN ↗
The regional coverage remains excellent, but this kind of editorializing is the precise reason I stopped subscribing.
gruez · · focus · HN ↗
It's filed under "leaders". It's by definition supposed to be "editorializing", because it's an editorial.
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editorial" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Editorial