‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

New Satellite Engine Could Use Earth's Atmosphere to Stay in Orbit Indefinitely

68 points · 15 comments · GordonS

Loading the complete thread in the background. This saved snapshot is available now. Refresh

  1. chris_va · · focus · HN ↗
    Very much not a new idea: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Very_low_Earth_orbit" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Very_low_Earth_orbit

    Though fun to see. More interesting than the station keeping (indefinite part) is that it enables ~100km orbits, which are ~5x closer than what remote sensing satellites use today and thus could get 5x the resolution for the same instrument.

    1. t2r3121 · · focus · HN ↗
      Yes, the article also points out that the idea is not new, but rather that this research was focused on addressing practical problems, such as corrosion of the engine&#x27;s parts.
    2. bottlepalm · · focus · HN ↗
      Ideas require a ton of research to transform into reality.
    3. Someone · · focus · HN ↗
      [delayed]
    4. idiotsecant · · focus · HN ↗
      An Alcubierre drive is not a new idea either, but if someone demonstrated one I would be mightily impressed.

      That is an extreme example for multiple reasons, of course, but the point is that the gulf between idea and working thing is often monstrous. Ideas are cheap, implementation is hard.

    5. MeteorMarc · · focus · HN ↗
      100km is the height where meteoroids ablate. You must mean 100k miles and even there the largest meteors start to become visible.
  2. metalman · · focus · HN ↗
    &#x27;contactless, neutralizer-less radio-frequency (RF) helicon plasma thruster&#x27;

    fairly sure that wins just on the absolute impossibility of creating an acronym , just all business

    works in wind tunnel testing.

    1. tocs3 · · focus · HN ↗
      It may never work then:)
  3. while_true_ · · focus · HN ↗
    The Earth&#x27;s upper atmosphere is delicate. It&#x27;s already being disturbed with rocket fuel residue and particulate space junk. Vacuuming up air and ionizing it risks putting the upper atmosphere even more out of balance.
    1. rkagerer · · focus · HN ↗
      Could you elaborate on that?

      The article mentions &quot;both positive and negative ions are pushed out of the thruster&quot;.

      Won&#x27;t the ions eventually recombine?

  4. fouc · · focus · HN ↗
    [delayed]
  5. PowerElectronix · · focus · HN ↗
    The thing is is this kind of engine does better than a regular one +big tank of propeller in the lifetime of a VLEO satellite, which due to newer regulation by the US is 5 years, so you don&#x27;t really need eve a big tank
  6. NetMageSCW · · focus · HN ↗
    Feels like someone SpaceX would be very interested in hiring.

    Too bad this wasn’t available for SWIFT.

  7. rf15 · · focus · HN ↗
    Basically the attempt to make a Bussard Ramjet work?

    <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Bussard_ramjet" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Bussard_ramjet

  8. Danox · · focus · HN ↗
    I would hope technology is moving into that direction, because the current primitive system is not sustainable. Also note, this will mean cooperation with all of your so-called allies, uh-oh…
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.