Thread

1. hazard · 1790546205 · focus · HN ↗

   Pangram check on the article: 94% of this text is AI

   1. blastingrock · 1790549556 · focus · HN ↗

      it's really obvious too
   2. singpolyma3 · 1790549829 · focus · HN ↗

      Pangram check on this comment: 142% of this text is AI
   3. meander_water · 1790550141 · focus · HN ↗

      I actually think this might be a false positive. I think it got tripped up by the higher than average use of jargon (which I don't mind here because the article itself flowed well and raised good points).

      Gpt-zero scores "human", and I've always found it to be a better judge

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.