The concurrency and threading in Go just feels like magic compared to every other language. I'm a goroutine addict and I refuse to be rehabilitated.
Just from observations over the years, I don't think there's any other language quite like this, in terms of how things can end up happening in any thread.
It's also just as easy to incorrectly share memory and cause race conditions. There's no protection against it and it violates memory safety.
For sure. The parent comment was merely asking if it could be done without channels or mutex, not if it was a good idea or not. Of course sometimes it is indeed the right thing to do.
SamInTheShell · · focus · HN ↗
Just from observations over the years, I don't think there's any other language quite like this, in terms of how things can end up happening in any thread.
tym0 · · focus · HN ↗
Stick to err/wait group and go routines and it's OK. Any PR with a channel or mutex I'll assume the author made a mistake.
lolpython · · focus · HN ↗
osigurdson · · focus · HN ↗
treyd · · focus · HN ↗
osigurdson · · focus · HN ↗