Thread

1. arpinum · 1790528924 · focus · HN ↗

   "46 at true 100% conformance". This is factually incorrect. Inspected their DynamoDB service and it comes nowhere close to implementing the full api.

   1. arpinum · 1790529441 · focus · HN ↗

      Here are some bugs: - `ADD m.a.c :inc` update expression wrote a literal top-level m.a.c attribute but didn't change the nested number. - TransactGetItems returned fields not requested. - update expression can update the same key multiple times.

      In total my conformance suite found 583 failures out of 1279 tests.

      1. lucas_vieira · 1790560282 · focus · HN ↗

         Thank you. I'm going through the DynamoDB issues now, starting with the three you listed. The Parity Suite is great. I'm wiring it into fakecloud's CI.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.