‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

How to keep enjoying programming in a world of LLMs

352 points · 350 comments · signa11

  1. beej71 · · focus · HN ↗
    One thing to keep in mind is that anytime you punt to the LLM (or anybody) for anything, that skill is going to atrophy.

    I've seen this happen to myself where suddenly I had trouble planning out the architecture for a very small project. It should have been obvious to me, and I knew that. So it was disconcerting to not be able to suddenly have the answer appear in front of me like it normally would. I thought maybe I would go to Claude and help get some ideas.

    But then I stopped myself. I knew I should be able to do this! So I got out a piece of paper and I scribbled ideas until the dam burst and suddenly the entire design was obvious, like it should have been in the first place. It took about 5 minutes.

    But those were an alarming 5 minutes. It was like I'd gone blind to the solution.

    And I realized that when I asked Claude for a bunch of ideas and then I selected the best one based on my experience, I was exercising that exact skill. I wasn't exercising the skill of coming up with the solution from scratch.

    Lots of times we're happy letting particular skills atrophy. Maybe we don't like exercising them and we just don't want to do that anymore. And I think that's valid.

    Just be careful how you use it.

    1. pton_xd · · focus · HN ↗
      5 minutes... what about 5 hours, or 5 days? Imagine spending 5 hours with a pen and paper sketching solutions. Unthinkable to spend that amount of time "unproductively" today. I feel like there's just so much pressure to make visible progress, and with these tools available it's getting harder to convince yourself to take the time to think.
      1. gspr · · focus · HN ↗
        Absolutely not unthinkable! We're paid for exactly that in research, for example.

        It's terrifying to hear that 5 hours of focused thinking is considered crazy. I can understand a budget battle if it's 5 months, but 5 hours?! Everyone, in every profession (or none), would be better off mentally if they "wasted" 5 hours thinking about something every now and then!

        1. kaffekaka · · focus · HN ↗
          I completely agree with you, but being "better off mentally" is really not valued very highly today.

          Fast, visible progress and delivery is the melody.

          1. gspr · · focus · HN ↗
            If you were in need of legal services in a high-stakes case, or if you needed brain surgery, would you want "fast visible progress" or "I need to think this through"?

            I'd say both relevant professions are highly regarded.

            1. auggierose · · focus · HN ↗
              Why do you think that brain surgeons "think this through"? They just get on with the job, one brain after another. Same with legal services.
              1. gspr · · focus · HN ↗
                And "getting on with the job" in those professions involves stopping and thinking.
                1. auggierose · · focus · HN ↗
                  Just like my AI. They also think before and during a code refactoring. There is a gap between my prompt and them taking actions, you could call that "stopping and thinking".
              2. eiginn · · focus · HN ↗
                A very good friend, who is not a brain surgeon, but designs and plans brain surgeries for clinical trials with the very brain surgeons doing the surgeries. So yes they do think it through and even do entire dry runs through every step.
                1. auggierose · · focus · HN ↗
                  But they just apply well-known methods. This type of thinking an AI can do, too.
          2. josephg · · focus · HN ↗
            Sometimes you gotta do things that others don’t value highly. A long career needs you to act with good judgment. Even - sometimes - when the optics are bad.
        2. daemin · · focus · HN ↗
          If 5 hours of thinking time to solve a problem is unthinkable to some people does that mean they have some form of Attention Deficit Disorder, be it a natural thing or introduced by an over-dependence on LLMs? Like stopping for an hour to think through a problem is unfathomable and instead they would rather hit small dopamine spikes every few minutes from talking to a chatbot?
          1. gspr · · focus · HN ↗
            I think you're onto something. And we're on a fast path to normalizing, even encouraging, this kind of behavior, so I'm very worried.
        3. xnx · · focus · HN ↗
          5 hours of focused thinking is crazy if your coworker can do it in 30 minutes.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.