‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

We're gonna need a lot more mathematicians

407 points · 504 comments · srcreigh

  1. Animats · · focus · HN ↗
    "We’re gonna need a lot more mathematicians."

    What the article really says is that we're going to need much smarter mathematicians. That is not possible for puny meat-brain humans. Humans are close to their ceiling. AIs are just getting started.

    In practice, we're probably going to hit that limit first in IC design. I once went to a talk by the Intel engineering manager who headed the Pentium Pro effort. That was the first superscalar x86 CPU, and it took about 5,000 engineers at peak to design it. Getting that many people coordinated on one thing was a real achievement. Then Intel stayed with minor tweaks on that design for years.

    We're soon going to be seeing designs of even greater complexity cranked out by AIs. No human will understand them at the gate level. Reading AI-written programming language code is bad enough. Reading AI-written Verilog may be beyond human comprehension, except in small sections.

    1. david-gpu · · focus · HN ↗
      > I once went to a talk by the Intel engineering manager who headed the Pentium Pro effort. That was the first superscalar x86 CPU

      The original Pentium was already superscalar, with its asymmetrical U and V pipes.

      The Pentium Pro added out of order execution via register renaming. A true achievement, indeed.

      And as for the more general point you are making: computer chips have been far too complex for any single human to comprehend for decades. I left NVidia after working there as an archutect for five years, barely understanding anything about those behemoths.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.