One thing I find notable about S3 today is that, while it used to drop in price reasonably often, there hasn't been a price drop in a full decade:
And that's by official inflation numbers. If you go by how much prices of food and rent increased i think you get a number more like 50 or 60 cents
Can someone please explain what was apparently wrong with my comment?
GiB is unambiguously the big one, power of two. You want S3 to be priced in dollars per GiB. "shrinkflation power of ten GiB" is getting it backwards.
Amazon S3 storage usage is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB), defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Similarly, 1 TB is 2^40 bytes, i.e. 1024 GBs.
I guess they could just change that overnight in the future. Still, a lot better than charging for Storage Units or similarly arbitrary unit.
simonw · · focus · HN ↗
OrangeDelonge · · focus · HN ↗
someonebaggy · · focus · HN ↗
magicalhippo · · focus · HN ↗
bigiain · · focus · HN ↗
Dylan16807 · · focus · HN ↗
Dylan16807 · · focus · HN ↗
GiB is unambiguously the big one, power of two. You want S3 to be priced in dollars per GiB. "shrinkflation power of ten GiB" is getting it backwards.
magicalhippo · · focus · HN ↗
Amazon S3 storage usage is calculated in binary gigabytes (GB), where 1 GB is 2^30 bytes. This unit of measurement is also known as a gibibyte (GiB), defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Similarly, 1 TB is 2^40 bytes, i.e. 1024 GBs.
I guess they could just change that overnight in the future. Still, a lot better than charging for Storage Units or similarly arbitrary unit.
[1]: <a href="https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/#S3_Pricing_Details" rel="nofollow">https://aws.amazon.com/s3/pricing/#S3_Pricing_Details