> That makes a lot of sense in a world where we’re importing all our software from strangers. It makes less sense in the world we’re heading to, where most of the software we’re carving up fiefdoms for has the same provenance.
If I'm running software written by an LLM, even if I was the one who prompted the LLM, I would still want my OS to treat it as if written by a stranger.
I know he's not necessarily talking about relaxing security models here, but he's not being very specific about his vision otherwise.
Nope. There has never been a "good" post written in this genre ("I'm leaving my last team, here's my new project") and I'm not going to waste interesting bits on my pro-forma transition post.
I didn't submit this! Happy to chat about it, but I feel like I was pretty clear in the post that I wasn't bidding for the front page.
I think you got your comment replies mixed up? I don't see the relevance of this (<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851040">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851040) to that (<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850998">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49850998).
Sorry, I'm responding to the (apt) complaint that there aren't a lot of details in the post. They're right, and I'm just adding why.
chroma_zone · · focus · HN ↗
If I'm running software written by an LLM, even if I was the one who prompted the LLM, I would still want my OS to treat it as if written by a stranger.
I know he's not necessarily talking about relaxing security models here, but he's not being very specific about his vision otherwise.
tptacek · · focus · HN ↗
I didn't submit this! Happy to chat about it, but I feel like I was pretty clear in the post that I wasn't bidding for the front page.
zahlman · · focus · HN ↗
tptacek · · focus · HN ↗
zahlman · · focus · HN ↗