Users might see it as a good thing to have yet another feature, but this sort of type-softness is why Excel is bad. In general having every feature is a bad thing, you need constraints to design things, to have idioms.
Making everything flexible is what allows you to make spaghetti that nobody understands.
Excel does not need to be as opinionated or portable as a programming language. This might actually be a lesser of two evils considering what type of user behavior it encourages. (I've heard a similar ethos behind certain design decisions of Go)
lordnacho · · focus · HN ↗
Making everything flexible is what allows you to make spaghetti that nobody understands.
spbaar · · focus · HN ↗
Grombobulous · · focus · HN ↗
Excel allows and embraces whatever mess you want to make.