‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Too AI; Didn't Read

111 points · 113 comments · rfonseca

  1. lemontheme · · focus · HN ↗
    If it’s not worth writing, it’s not worth reading.

    That said, wouldn’t it be funny if this site, too, were AI generated?

    1. ragequittah · · focus · HN ↗
      I just wonder how many people smugly cry 'slop' and then immediately go ask chatgpt about something they want to know about. I suspect it's a surprisinly large amount.
      1. DragonStrength · · focus · HN ↗
        There’s a difference between using and sharing. I don’t want to see your notebook. I want to see the finished document. To some of us, the difference is intuitively obvious, so we’re offended by what we’re getting at work these days.
        1. ragequittah · · focus · HN ↗
          I'm very envious of your workplace if the stuff before AI was somehow well written. If I had AI 10 years ago I would've been mostly using it to interpret most of the corporate speak e-mails and poorly written technical briefs.
          1. DragonStrength · · focus · HN ↗
            Now I get corporate-speak tech docs in addition to irrelevant internal comms. AI doesn't magically make your coworkers put in more effort. It just puts a veneer of professionalism over the same output.
      2. andrewflnr · · focus · HN ↗
        Those are different though. One is just reading your own slop, the other is trying to make others read your slop. I don't love either one, but it's clear that one is a lot worse.
      3. cindyllm · · focus · HN ↗

        [dead]

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.