Thread

1. ck2 · 1790365755 · focus · HN ↗

   hacked, copied and distributed to countries that are trying to harm us in 3, 2, 1

   remember Heritage Foundation spent a small fortune to try to find illegal voting over the past decades and they only found a handful of cases, most accidental and not willful and far too few to cause any effect at all

   if the Dems get the Senate somehow and don't immediately pass laws to protect voting against actions of the Executive, well then they deserve to lose 2028

   of course he'll veto everything but there might be enough will to override

   1. jshier · 1790367926 · focus · HN ↗

      Even if the Democrats take the House and the Senate this year, and pass a new Voting Rights Act, there's no reason to believe it will have any effect, since it will be immediately vetoed by the President. So I'm not sure your expectations are in line with reality here.

      26 - 28 I expect the Democrats to investigate, write reports, block nominees, and occasionally pass legislation they know will be vetoed but otherwise have no effect. I hope everyone is ready for reality here.

      1. alwaysthiserror · 1790368942 · focus · HN ↗

         I expect the most relevant action to most people's lives will be some nasty budget showdowns (likely not affecting ICE, since they're funded for years already and attempting to touch that will not go well) and the really interesting thing to see will be whether Trump's administration attempts to reverse the executive-created (and rather arbitrary and silly) modern idea of what a "shutdown" is, or will attempt to significantly adjust the (again, kinda arbitrary anyway) traditionally categories for what does and doesn't continue to be funded.

         AFAIK it's never been argued in court, it's just what someone in the executive branch in the late '70s decided should happen, and before that in the event of failure to pass a budget it was assumed that spending should continue as-is, until another budget is passed, more-or-less. It's not even clear it'd be illegal if he just went on like nothing had happened.

         1. pocksuppet · 1790385485 · focus · HN ↗

            I think given the past history it is reasonable to assume the executive branch will ignore the budget and spend and raise money how it wants.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.