AI is very efficient when you ask them to do a specific, one-objective task. It has no independence whatsoever, that's why it cannot _replace_ humans. This is evident for anyone using AI routinely.
Of course this doesn't mean we may need less amount of humans for certain jobs, or that I'm the future AI will gain new abilities.
One human needs to teach one AI system how to do one specific task. Everyone can now use this. Before you had to teach every single human having to do this task and the next generation.
> One human needs to teach one AI system how to do one specific task. Everyone can now use this. Before you had to teach every single human having to do this task and the next generation.
We already had that before AI. The problem was precisely that it's too inefficient to make a new system for each different task. Of course, the new AI is more multimodal, etc, but up to what point? Not clear so far.
robotpepi · · focus · HN ↗
Of course this doesn't mean we may need less amount of humans for certain jobs, or that I'm the future AI will gain new abilities.
Glemmlko · · focus · HN ↗
One human needs to teach one AI system how to do one specific task. Everyone can now use this. Before you had to teach every single human having to do this task and the next generation.
robotpepi · · focus · HN ↗
We already had that before AI. The problem was precisely that it's too inefficient to make a new system for each different task. Of course, the new AI is more multimodal, etc, but up to what point? Not clear so far.