Thread

1. qnleigh · 1790394181 · focus · HN ↗

   Susskind's original paper is shockingly readable, at least the first section. It doesn't use a lot of fancy math or derivations to justify holography. Mostly it uses basic concepts from undergraduate physics to show how the idea of holography is consistent and makes sense, despite it seeming incredibly counterintuitive at first glance.

   For instance, figure 3 shows how you can't hide a black hole behind another black hole, which has implications for how a 3D universe can be completely encoded in a 2D region.

   <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;html&#x2F;hep-th&#x2F;9409089v2" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;arxiv.org&#x2F;html&#x2F;hep-th&#x2F;9409089v2

   1. jmvoodoo · 1790435370 · focus · HN ↗

      Thank you. This is far easier to understand than the OP.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.