Thread

1. yepyoukno · 1790351192 · focus · HN ↗

   [dead]

   1. krapp · 1790352827 · focus · HN ↗

      Physics threads on HN can be so entertaining.

      1. copperx · 1790353571 · focus · HN ↗

         Any HN thread where real thought is required devolves into insanity quickly.
      2. yepyoukno · 1790354675 · focus · HN ↗

         [dead]

         1. krapp · 1790367288 · focus · HN ↗

            Sir, this is a Wendy's.
   2. Den_VR · 1790353581 · focus · HN ↗

      What if you half spin the other direction?

      1. yepyoukno · 1790354552 · focus · HN ↗

         Why would it matter?

         A torsion to the right, a torsion to the left mate in circular momentum.

         Sounds like complementary spins.

      2. pixl97 · 1790357273 · focus · HN ↗

         Like matter verses anti-matter? If so I think this has actually been considered by physicists hence we tested to ensure that anti-matter responds to gravity in the same way as matter.

         If anit-matter had shown anti-gravity effects then gravity may have been just some imbalance of forces in the universe, but it doesn't appear to be that way.

   3. classified · 1790353985 · focus · HN ↗

      > Sub-atomic particles may then be discrete spin lock configurations and not distinct in any other way.

      Using a spin lock is wasteful and not the best move in times of rising energy prices. Use a mutex to put the waiting thread to sleep.

      1. yepyoukno · 1790354613 · focus · HN ↗

         [dead]

   4. done_lurking · 1790355600 · focus · HN ↗

      This is an interesting theory, but I think it has less explanatory power than the Sugon framework for gravity.

      1. ltbarcly3 · 1790358132 · focus · HN ↗

         This is not a theory.

         1. done_lurking · 1790359544 · focus · HN ↗

            You are half spin torsioning my subatomic particles right now

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.