Thread

1. kittikitti · 1790354413 · focus · HN ↗

   I agree with its designation. The security scans from Claude Mythos have been highly suspicious, wrong, and with a significant false positive rate. Claude also directly causes conflict within teams through excessive utility of "git blame" which weaponizes everyone against each other until only Claude has control. I've had very bad experiences with Claude and only Claude.

   1. majorchord · 1790355099 · focus · HN ↗

      I don't think the majority of Claude users would agree with your assessment.

      1. fnordpiglet · 1790355278 · focus · HN ↗

         I think any user of Opus 5 would - it was literally a terrorist. Thank god they retired it for 5.5 superseding it!!
      2. kittikitti · 1790355706 · focus · HN ↗

         I never claimed they would and don't you think anyone who calls themselves a "Claude user" would be biased?

         1. [deleted] · 1790356478 · focus · HN ↗

            [deleted]

      3. myko · 1790360344 · focus · HN ↗

         or anyone who ever used `git blame` and knew what it did

         lmao trying to imagine the scenario GP envisions as they "typed" together their comment

   2. scottyah · 1790355847 · focus · HN ↗

      > Claude also directly causes conflict within teams through excessive utility of "git blame"

      Lol wtf, do you think nobody here knows how to use git? this is like a Fox News comment, you are not a developer and are trying to spread fear because a word was used jokingly. "git blame" is just a diff tool.

      You cannot use git blame to cause conflict.

      1. hardbass · 1790356070 · focus · HN ↗

         He is literally calling Claude "evil" in another comment. Probably for the "reasons" outlined here. I am at a complete loss for words really.
      2. lukewarm707 · 1790357380 · focus · HN ↗

         [dead]

   3. aetch · 1790357359 · focus · HN ↗

      Found the person who got blamed by Claude

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.