‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Allow babywearing carriers on planes

202 points · 277 comments · surprisetalk

  1. poltergeist11 · · focus · HN ↗

    [dead]

    1. ryeats · · focus · HN ↗
      No one travels with babies for fun, visiting my terminally Ill mother over the several years of her decline was indeed a nightmare with young children, we would not have put ourselves through that otherwise.
      1. kortilla · · focus · HN ↗
        > No one travels with babies for fun

        I have encountered this many times flying so it’s not “no one”. It’s usually younger couples who either don’t know what they are getting into or just have the energy to deal with it.

        On international flights from the US it’s common to hear the reason is to bring the baby to see extended family.

        1. compiler-guy · · focus · HN ↗
          That’s not what the idiom “don’t do x for fun” is about.

          The expression means that X is the best of unpalatable options to accomplish something else, where X is taken in a literal and narrow sense.

          People don’t fly with babies for fun. They do it because visiting grandparents is fun, and driving isn’t a good option. Or, if it involves a trip across the ocean, the alternative would be sailing.

          1. kortilla · · focus · HN ↗
            Well that’s idiotic. Approximately nobody “flies for fun” under that tortured definition.
            1. compiler-guy · · focus · HN ↗
              It’s a common idiom. And idioms are often weird. But that is exactly the point.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.