‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

First Principles Thinking

287 points · 138 comments · sunils34

  1. bob1029 · · focus · HN ↗
    Higher order thinking is more important and rare.

    An aggressive first principles approach often leads otherwise well-intentioned technologists into strategic / ideological dead-ends.

    Do we do things because it's the "right thing" to do in the moment, or because of the final outcome that will eventually result?

    The most ideal answer is somewhere in the middle. I am far more interested in the total area under the curve than a single instant in time.

    In lieu of intentional higher order thinking, simply working backward from your customer on a regular basis will generally accomplish the same outcomes.

    1. throwaway27448 · · focus · HN ↗
      > Higher order thinking is more important and rare.

      Is it?

      > In lieu of intentional higher order thinking, simply working backward from your customer on a regular basis will generally accomplish the same outcomes.

      And here I thought we were discussing something important!

      1. csallen · · focus · HN ↗
        > Higher order thinking is more important and rare.

        I was just talking with a friend the other day about how many problems and issues would be solved if people were more conditioned to asking, "...and then what?"

        1. throwaway27448 · · focus · HN ↗
          "Compared to what?" is another good one.
          1. csallen · · focus · HN ↗
            Love it, great example
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.