‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

The Test

171 points · 89 comments · latexr

  1. mccoyb · · focus · HN ↗
    I'm always surprised by statements about "things we don't need to learn anymore" with AI.

    It's sort of a litmus test for how little someone understands how learning in humans works or AI itself even. "Agentic" AI acts as a mirror: the more insight have yourself, the more powerfully you can pull the distribution ... the more you get out of it. (there's a bloodborne-inspired parable in here somewhere ...)

    I think it's why the software from AI companies has "garbage" qualities. They are assuming that AI is going to fill in skills ... when it is a reflective amplifier.

    But back to the discussion of "things we don't need to learn anymore": do we go to the gym, and say ... oh I don't need to do pull ups anymore, because there's an assisted pull up machine and I can just set it to my weight ...

    Utterly idiotic.

    1. Gualdrapo · · focus · HN ↗
      Read somewhere something going like "ai is just as smart as the person using it"
      1. peaseagee · · focus · HN ↗
        I suspect that's the _ceiling_ of the AI and it's often much dumber.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.