‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Git-bug: Distributed, offline-first bug tracker embedded in Git

364 points · 111 comments · alentred

  1. jason_oster · · focus · HN ↗
    I tried git-bug a few months ago, and <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;git-bug&#x2F;git-bug&#x2F;issues&#x2F;1023" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;github.com&#x2F;git-bug&#x2F;git-bug&#x2F;issues&#x2F;1023 is a showstopper.

    There is a workaround, but it isn&#x27;t pretty. You can push&#x2F;pull bugs and identities with normal, ssh-agent-less git commands: <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;parasyte&#x2F;80ef925d4b01216f6bcb051356faffb9" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;gist.github.com&#x2F;parasyte&#x2F;80ef925d4b01216f6bcb051356f...

    1. michaelmure · · focus · HN ↗
      I&#x27;ll fix that soon. I really wanted to avoid calling the git binary for security reason, but I have to admit that go-git is not robust enough in some cases. I&#x27;ll have at least the option to use the git binary for push&#x2F;pull, possibly as a default depending on how it goes.
      1. jthoward64 · · focus · HN ↗
        You could always FFI to libgit2 rather than calling git
      2. jason_oster · · focus · HN ↗
        Glad to hear it! Thanks.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.