Thread

1. bflesch · 1790340269 · focus · HN ↗

   Looks really nice, I wonder why there hasn't been a project with this exact name and functionality before. When I think about it, "git bug" is quite limiting (the bug vs. feature discussion).

   Naming things is hard, but I can see that it might feel unnatural to use "git bug" to track features. Maybe that's totally okay because it does one thing - tracking bugs - very well, and the whole feature roadmap is living in another system/process anyways?

   1. michaelmure · 1790343845 · focus · HN ↗

      I do want to extend to pull-request and more, so I'll need to at least make space in the CLI commands. Having a "git bug bug" next to a "git bug pr" is quite ugly.

      Naming is hard, but I mostly didn't expect to reach that point :-)

      1. boredtofears · 1790347091 · focus · HN ↗

         Don't overthink it! `git bug bug` is fine - it's easy to type and becomes muscle memory quickly. Love the project, my first impression is "why hasn't this existed the entire time?" which usually means you're on to something.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.