‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

The Mafia may be keeping fentanyl out of Italy

204 points · 269 comments · runeks

  1. bilekas · · focus · HN ↗
    I'm no expert, but I've always thought that adding much more risk to the lives of your customers unnecessarily is not good for business.
    1. Someone · · focus · HN ↗
      In this market, a better high for less money will attract lots of customers, even if it is less healthy than the alternative.

      So, if you’re in the business of selling the somewhat healthier product, and one supplier starts to supply the otherwise superior product, that’s not good for business, either. You will lose customers.

      Now, do you accept that, saying “I won’t sell that”, do you fight to outlaw the product (will be hard given at you’re not selling healthy products, either), do you fight the suppliers of the new product (a gang war) or do you add the product to your inventory?

      There often isn’t a clear choice; each option has its pros and cons.

      1. bigfishrunning · · focus · HN ↗
        "less healthy" is a bit of an understatement; they're not selling cigarettes that will kill you in the long term (or even the medium or short term). Fentanyl will kill you the first time you're exposed to it.

        Increasing the potency of some drug with fentanyl is an interesting choice, because by the time the user *knows* how strong it is, there's some likelihood they're already dead.

        1. Someone · · focus · HN ↗
          > Fentanyl will kill you the first time you're exposed to it.

          Its lethal dose is a lot smaller than that of heroin, but it isn’t guaranteed to kill. If it were, why is it used so much in medicine?

          <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Fentanyl" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;en.wikipedia.org&#x2F;wiki&#x2F;Fentanyl: “Fentanyl is a highly potent synthetic opioid of the piperidine family, used primarily as pain medication

          […]

          In 2015, 1,600 kilograms (3,500 pounds) were used in healthcare globally.

          It is on the World Health Organization&#x27;s List of Essential Medicines.”

          1. TeMPOraL · · focus · HN ↗
            There&#x27;s always a continuity there (&quot;the dose makes the poison&quot;), there&#x27;s no known substance that will reliably kill you if you&#x27;re exposed to a single molecule of it.

            The issue with potency is that the more potent a substance, the more precise equipment and quality control you need to stay on the safe side. With fentanyl, healthcare and pharmaceutical industry can handle the precision and QC demands (which includes guarantees and maintaining public trust). Criminal enterprises cannot.

            1. RajT88 · · focus · HN ↗
              Carfentanil has got to be closer to that. It is said to be up to 100x more powerful than fentanyl.

              Micrograms (yes still many molecules) could be lethal

              1. cjbgkagh · · focus · HN ↗
                1.53 × 10¹⁵ molecules per 1mcg. Which is 15 orders of magnitude larger than a single molecule. If 2mg of fentanyl is considered potentially lethal that would place carfentanyl at 20mcg, though I’ve heard conflicting reports on potency with some placing it at 10x not 100x. So roughly 16-17 orders of magnitudes.

                I don’t take fentanyl but I regularly take signaling peptides where the doses are typically in the mcg range and still rather potent - though with signaling peptides the response curve typically flattens out so bigger doses don’t necessarily mean stronger effects - they can be saturated. Depends on what you’re signaling though.

                I had correctly predicted my hypersensitivity to semaglutide (ozempic) so started using it for treating autoimmune issues at a dose of 25mcg and I still ended up with temporary gastroparesis.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.