‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Oracle on the hook to pay data centre investors even if site has no electricity

158 points · 154 comments · Betelbuddy

  1. be8e9dmrro · · focus · HN ↗

    [dead]

    1. mitxela · · focus · HN ↗
      Or just pause training at night
      1. iso1631 · · focus · HN ↗
        The bulk of the cost is the machines, not the power.

        If you have a machine which is worthless after 3 years, then if you only run it for 12 hours a day rather than 24 then it costs twice as much per hour in deprecation.

        If your machine costs $1000 to buy and $1 a day for 24 hours to run with a lifetime of 1000 days, then the total cost is $2000 to generate 24,000 hours of output, or 8 cents an hour.

        If you run it for 12 hours your cost drops to $1500 to generate 12,000 hours of output, or 12 cents an hour.

        You could of course just add batteries to your solar. A 5GW power plant in the south of the US, add 10GW or 20GW of solar, add 60GWh of battery storage, in summer export excess to grid (when there's a lot of demand for AC), in winter you could import a small amount from grid, or run smaller amounts of energy.

        The capital cost is way below the cost of the equipment you're powering, and land is less than a rounding error. If you don't have the grid then just don't export the excess power, or use it to give free EV charging to locals

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.