‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Topcoat is pushing the boundary of server applications with Rust

113 points · 100 comments · sagacity

  1. lolakutty · · focus · HN ↗
    Why bother with rust when you can write it in C and ask an LLM to weed out the memory bugs?
    1. Georgelemental · · focus · HN ↗
      Why bother with asking an LLM to weed out the memory bugs when you can write it in Rust?
      1. lolakutty · · focus · HN ↗
        > when you can write it in Rust..

        Because fuck borrow checker..(and the horrible syntax)

        1. felipellrocha · · focus · HN ↗
          I don't get the complaints about the horrible syntax. The syntax is fine... Which is weird cause I only get complains from c/c++ folk, and that set of languages have objectively AWFUL syntax
          1. simpsond · · focus · HN ↗
            It’s subjective. Some folks think lisps are it, others basic. Folks need to accept that we do not need global alignment on what good syntax means.
          2. lolakutty · · focus · HN ↗
            Rust's syntax is horrible not because of the braces. But due to the type system information the code has to carry. And the type system, unlike something like Haskell, is not always smart enough to infer the types from the context. Which cause even more noise in the form of type hints!

            Add to that the horror of life time annotations, you really have a mess at your hands. I have seen projects litter clone everywhere just to sidestep this mess.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.