Thread

1. ricardobeat · 1790328018 · focus · HN ↗

   A note to the developers in the project, if anyone is reading: your repositories are in violation of the new Codeberg policy that forbids AI-generated code [1].

   [1] <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.codeberg.org&#x2F;protecting-our-floss-commons-from-llms.html" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;blog.codeberg.org&#x2F;protecting-our-floss-commons-from-...

   1. rvz · 1790330523 · focus · HN ↗

      I predict that Codeberg will soon realize that they have no choice but to loosen and allow AI generated code.

      There is no point in being on the extreme end around banning all code generated by AI.

      Regardless, there is AI generated code in many repositories on Codeberg anyway.

      1. YorickPeterse · 1790349408 · focus · HN ↗

         Banning AI generated content works just fine, and arguing otherwise is nothing short of FOMO.

         As a random example, AI generated content is banned from the &#x2F;r&#x2F;ProgrammingLanguages subreddit and any regular visitor that _isn&#x27;t_ suffering from AI psychosis&#x2F;FOMO will tell you it&#x27;s for the better. In general it&#x27;s not that difficult to moderate for it either as AI built projects consistently contain the same patterns _over and over_ such that 98% is easily detected.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.