‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

What About Rails?

334 points · 236 comments · jrochkind1

  1. fhub · · focus · HN ↗
    I code and maintain a Rails stack. About 20% of the time an endpoint takes to respond is spent in Ruby. New Relic tells me our Apdex is 99, and it’s very rare for an endpoint to take more than 100ms. Most respond in under 80ms. I could LLM-port it (and probably will one day), but end-user response performance wouldn’t be the motivation.

    What does make me consider switching is reading about things like how Shopify’s native apps are moving towards superfast product cores that can be tested incredibly quickly, with the slower UX layer kept separate. I think that model is the future, and in that world Rails starts to look pretty dead.

    1. slopinthebag · · focus · HN ↗
      this ignores utilization and throughput
      1. fhub · · focus · HN ↗
        Peak throughput per day is 3k req/m.
        1. slopinthebag · · focus · HN ↗
          and you host that on a $5 vps I assume
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.