‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

California is chasing wealth that has feet

293 points · 870 comments · idbnstra

  1. MrZander · · focus · HN ↗
    I agree the proposed wealth tax is a bad idea, but raising property taxes is probably not viable. They are incredibly unfavorable to voters. No one who owns a home wants to pay rent, that's why you buy in the first place.

    Personally, this is why I am fine with higher income or sales taxes.

    1. JKCalhoun · · focus · HN ↗
      "Personally, this is why I am fine with higher income or sales taxes."

      Indeed, the working poor need to pay more in taxes.

      1. jrockway · · focus · HN ↗
        Not even the poor. Really everyone working. I would much rather sleep all day and live off of a pile of money than to show up somewhere and do something for money. That's the tax -- 35% of your waking hours are now at the service of someone else. And yet, they charge income tax on that. Stay home and live off a stash of money in your mattress, 0% tax, 0 obligations. Wake up and commute to work, 35% of your week gone, 35% of your "income" gone.

        I am not even that mad that I personally have to pay taxes. I enjoy funding government programs! I think I owe society something! But it sure doesn't make sense that already being rich makes you immune to giving back to the society that made you that way.

        1. 8note · · focus · HN ↗
          everyone working is the poor.

          the rich are an astounding amount of wealthy such that they dont show up and still make a good poor wage in the first couple hours/days of a year by their assets increasing in value

          you are poor, even if you are doing plenty well for yourself

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.