‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

F-Droid 2.0

1465 points · 420 comments · daveoc64

  1. jjice · · focus · HN ↗
    What does the future of something like F-Droid look like once Google does their lock down next year?
    1. pritambaral · · focus · HN ↗
      Since F-Droid (i.e., the repositories, not the app) builds all apps, a practical solution would be for the repositories (i.e., their signing keys) to be recognized by El Goog. Whether and how much help / obstacle the "maybe we do evil" company puts up for / against this is a different question.
      1. trinsic2 · · focus · HN ↗
        It seems to me this is a blocker to use if google can restrict sideloading like this. Its not going to end with just get people requiring to register their app with an identity. Wont they be able to put presser on f-droid devs to lock out software they consider a threat to some business model?
        1. McDyver · · focus · HN ↗
          > sideloading

          That newspeak term should just disappeared. It only contributes to the image that downloading and installing an app is something that is outside the "happy path". Installing software of your choice on a device you own shouldn't be demonised

          1. ragequittah · · focus · HN ↗
            Surely you see how installing unvetted software on a device that holds your entire life, bank info, photos, etc. probably shouldn't be part of the "happy path" for most people. You shouldn't even install software you haven't fully vetted from the google play store. This should be drilled into non-technical people.

            Those of us who want to can easily bypass it. My mom who doesn't know what she's doing and gets a phishing email with a fancy apk attached should probably have a hard time using it.

            1. krzyk · · focus · HN ↗
              That means education for people: don't perform actions that are in emails.

              Blocking apps is like blocking buying of knifes because one can hurt themselves.

              1. halostatue · · focus · HN ↗
                Because education has worked so well on Windows.

                There's not an easy answer, but the non-answer of "people just need to be educated" is trivially dismissed.

                1. Aachen · · focus · HN ↗
                  I'm not sure the situations are comparable when Windows doesn't have this permission system where the apps are still very limited in what they can access unless you grant specific directory access or access to the contact list or such
                  1. wizzwizz4 · · focus · HN ↗
                    It does, but approximately nobody uses it, because Microsoft also tried to apply loads of constraints on what kinds of program could exist when they rolled it out, as part of their "all Windows software should also work on Windows Phone and Xbox" campaign.
Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.