Thread

1. patall · 1790265425 · focus · HN ↗

   Can someone explain why the old books could really be relevant. I get the pre-nuclear steel analogy, but why is this relevant given how much more modern texts exist. A few years ago, millions of yahoo groups were erased but now a few thousand books are what is needed to run a successful AI company? I mean, it can barely be about the information in those books (that would be very often outdated), but just for a little more text (with ever less marginal gain), what is the benefit?

   1. lofaszvanitt · 1790290828 · focus · HN ↗

      Well, most of the old books are much easier to read than the new ones. Back then people were much more educated and had a much wider vocabulary....

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.