Thread

1. patall · 1790265425 · focus · HN ↗

   Can someone explain why the old books could really be relevant. I get the pre-nuclear steel analogy, but why is this relevant given how much more modern texts exist. A few years ago, millions of yahoo groups were erased but now a few thousand books are what is needed to run a successful AI company? I mean, it can barely be about the information in those books (that would be very often outdated), but just for a little more text (with ever less marginal gain), what is the benefit?

   1. ijk · 1790267883 · focus · HN ↗

      Because Yahoo in particular was very good at destroying goldmines shortly before they became ultra valuable.

      There's a number of places that destroyed vast amounts of data in the wind down of ZIRP that probably regret it now.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.