Thread

1. shevy-java · 1790262513 · focus · HN ↗

   [dead]

   1. philipallstar · 1790262787 · focus · HN ↗

      [dead]

      1. etchalon · 1790263366 · focus · HN ↗

         Your argument is essentially that the Executive can ignore the Judicial branch, and the process of law, if they say they have a good reason.

         1. rootusrootus · 1790264960 · focus · HN ↗

            Perhaps the next president will wave the magic executive order wand and reduce the age of eligibility for Medicare to zero. Or something else equally spicy and very progressive. Republicans used to understand that eventually the other side will win an election and do unto you everything you have done unto them, but apparently the current crop thinks they will be ruling forever.

            1. krapp · 1790265641 · focus · HN ↗

               Contrary to popular belief, executive orders aren't laws and don't have the force of law. An executive order couldn't legally reduce the age of eligibility for Medicare.

               The only reason Trump gets away with it is because Congress is complicit in the authoritarian fiction of the President's "plenary authority" even to the point of obviously illegal things like undermining budget allocations and not doing their actual jobs.

               As soon as a Democrat gets in, Congress will miraculously become pedantic sticklers to the rules. This kind of corruption and blatant malfeasance is something only Republicans get away with, at least in the modern era.

               1. rootusrootus · 1790266607 · focus · HN ↗

                  With a big enough blue wave in 2026 and 2028, congress may be willing to turn a blind eye to a Democratic president doing extralegal things. I will not be shocked if this genie cannot be put back in the bottle. Throughout my life Republicans have been more creative about bending the rules, but the Democrats have reliably learned how to copy their game each time.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.