You're better off going directly to artificial analysis, this is a feature-poor/misleading/outdated repackaging
Ex. this type of price estimation is quite naive - some models can require 2-3x the number of tokens to achieve the same level of intelligence. Artificial Analysis' own cost per task is a more fair estimation of cost.
The analysis might be better on Artifical Analysis' however the way the information is presented by terrydjony is so much better. I'm able to get the exact actionable info I want. Whereas on artificial Analysis I'm analyzing and figuring it out.
It's the equivalent of ai slop writing in a data format.
ford · · focus · HN ↗
Ex. this type of price estimation is quite naive - some models can require 2-3x the number of tokens to achieve the same level of intelligence. Artificial Analysis' own cost per task is a more fair estimation of cost.
pickledish · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models#price-cost" rel="nofollow">https://artificialanalysis.ai/models#price-cost
<a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models?models=gpt-6-luna%2Cglm-5-3-flash%2Cmuse-spark-1-3%2Cqwen3-8-flash-next%2Cmimo-v2-6-pro#cost-tabs" rel="nofollow">https://artificialanalysis.ai/models?models=gpt-6-luna%2Cglm...
neuronexmachina · · focus · HN ↗
<a href="https://artificialanalysis.ai/models?cost=intelligence-vs-cost-per-task#token-use" rel="nofollow">https://artificialanalysis.ai/models?cost=intelligence-vs-co...
mpalczewski · · focus · HN ↗
It's the equivalent of ai slop writing in a data format.
mosselman · · focus · HN ↗
Spark is such a bad model, you are far better off using Astra Medium than using Spark.
gunapologist99 · · focus · HN ↗