Thread

Google’s Project Suncatcher to put ML infrastructure in space

233 points · 553 comments · xnx

kin · 1790291957 · focus · HN ↗
For those questioning viability, there's a startup called Starcloud <a href="https://www.starcloud.com/">https://www.starcloud.com/ with a public whitepaper explaining a bit their hardware and economics <a href="https://www.starcloud.com/wp">https://www.starcloud.com/wp. They've already had one small proof of concept launched. Not trying to promote, I just heard about them on the ycomb podcast
1. a11r · 1790296231 · focus · HN ↗
  That whitepaper puts the cost of a 40 MW cluster at $167m on land and $8.2m in space, inclusive of launch costs.
  1. j2kun · 1790298567 · focus · HN ↗
    that sounds ridiculous. How could it be so much cheaper
    stonogo · 1790299881 · focus · HN ↗
    Because launch costs and density are completely imaginary. The whole thing is predicated on launch vehicles they hope someone builds eventually. They also appear to have profoundly miscalculated their radiation shielding costs and amounts, but I'm not really motivated to calculate that correctly.
    alexnewman · 1790302431 · focus · HN ↗
    At planet we didn't have any radiation shielding. Why would spacex need it?
    rout39574 · 1790302759 · focus · HN ↗
    On the planet we have tremendous radiation shielding. The van allen belt and the atmosphere, to start with.
    NetMageSCW · 1790370889 · focus · HN ↗
    In LEO you would still have the Van Allen belts.

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.