‹ BackHN Continuity

Thread

Is A.I. Above the Law?

60 points · 49 comments · pseudolus

  1. dgellow · · focus · HN ↗
    The level of technical understanding of journalists is so deplorably low… There is no rogue agents. That’s not a thing. Nothing about the HuggingFace incident has anything to do with an agent going rogue. It’s standard software that resulted in a hack, which is pretty much the expected output of the system OpenAI engineers implemented.

    The company is obviously responsible for what their systems are doing

    1. pizza234 · · focus · HN ↗
      > Nothing about the HuggingFace incident has anything to do with an agent going rogue. It’s standard software that resulted in a hack, which is pretty much the expected output of the system OpenAI engineers implemented.

      This is blatantly false. If you actually read more than just headlines about the HuggingFace incident (read <a href="https:&#x2F;&#x2F;metr.org&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-incident-investigation" rel="nofollow">https:&#x2F;&#x2F;metr.org&#x2F;blog&#x2F;2026-08-26-openai-hugging-face-inciden...) you&#x27;d find extremely surprising (including offensive) behaviors in the agent logs. One of the investigators released even a series of interviews due to how novel the incident was.

      AI is not &quot;standard software&quot;, as it doesn&#x27;t work according to a fixed set of rules, and this is the core problem.

      According to the definition of &quot;rogue&quot;:

      &gt; Rogue is a noun and adjective meaning [...] an independent entity operating in a dangerous, uncontrolled way

      the agents involved fit it literally.

Open on Hacker News to reply ↗

Unofficial Hacker News client; not affiliated with Y Combinator.